NOTE: If you are unable to play the game, either try a different browser or go to the game website directly here.

2C: Examining the Data

Before you start any calculations, it is essential to examine your data. Ask yourself the following questions for the data collected in the Racer game:

  1. Were there any players who did not properly follow protocols? Did they play the game an incorrect number of times? Did they use the wrong cars or tracks? Can their data be included?
  2. Were there any outliers or skewed data? How does this influence our analysis? Should these outliers be removed?
  3. Some people have a natural talent for video games; to others, it’s a completely foreign concept. How can we account for player skill level?
  4. How do we account for the influence of order in which cars are raced? For example, would you expect players to perform better after practicing with the first car? 
  5. How does the variation in effect size (the difference between means) compare to the random variation in our data?
  6. Are there any other issues that may cause our data to be unreliable or invalid?
  7. What conditions are required to conduct a statistical analysis? How can you evaluate whether these conditions were met? If the sample size is small, it is particularly important to verify that the conditions are satisfied. What should you do if the needed conditions are not met?
Watch the following video to see an example of how data cleaning can influence a statistical analysis.


2D: Analyzing Data

Before we analyze the data your class has collected, let’s look at a sample dataset, called sample2. Get started by completing the questions below to make sure you understand how this app works, then analyze your class data. 

To use the app, start with the following settings then answer the questions below.

  • Group ID: sample2
  • Track: OvalTrack
  • X Variable: Body
  • Y Variable: FinishedTime
  • Color by: Body
  • Check: Show Summary Statistics


  • Instructors Note: Go to faculty resources to access student data


    2E: Get Curiousget curious icon

    1. Develop your own experimental design by rewriting the steps from Section 2B: Collecting Data. List the specific protocols that need to be followed for your new experiment. Make sure that you also address all three steps in Section 2A: Designing an Experiment section. 

    2. Using your class data, answer the seven questions identified in Section 2c:  Examining the Data.  

    3. Model Conditions:
    4. a. List the assumptions required to conduct a hypothesis test.
      b. Describe how you evaluated whether these conditions were met.
      c. What should you do if the needed assumptions are not met?

    5. If you collected data properly, you can use the Racer App above to analyze it. Use the data to conduct a hypothesis test to determine if there is a difference in the population average finishing time of the Classic and HotRod cars.
    6. a. Provide the test statistic and corresponding p-value.
      b. Give the 95 percent confidence interval and provide an interpretation.
      c. What conclusions can you draw from your class experiment? Clearly state your overall recommendation to someone wanting to win a race on the oval track.
    7. Watch the video titled "Deception at Duke": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eV9dcAGaVU8.
    8. a. Briefly summarize the video.
      b. Discuss how this Racer Lab is related to the errors discussed in this video.
      c. What policies should universities set in place to ensure this type of error does not occur again?
    9. How much do your conclusions depend on the data cleaning that was done?

    10. Could different response variables (Finish Time versus Top Speed versus Time to 30) result in different conclusions? Why or why not?

    11. If our p-value is large, can we be confident that the average finish times are the same for both cars?

    12. Assume your class repeated this experiment
    13. a. Would you expect to get similar results?
      b. Would you expect to get identical results?
      c. If we collected data from another sample of players from the population, do you think it would affect our conclusion?
      d. What exactly is the population for this study? Did we collect a true simple random sample?

    14. Many published articles show a p-value without discussing whether or not they modified or removed data. Does a small p-value guarantee that the study was done correctly? Why or why not?

    15. Does the hypothesis test or confidence interval provide more helpful information for our study? In particular, does the hypothesis test and p-value provide a good measure of the difference between average car speeds?

    16. The game on this page is simplistic. More advanced versions of this game, allowing for numerous types of experiments, are available here: Racer Game and here: RaceKart Game. What research questions could be addressed with these advanced games that could not be addressed with the simplistic game on this page?

    2F: Data Literacydata literacy icon

    1. Read the brief article discussing the ASA’s statement on statistical significance and p-values:   https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108. Pick one of the six principles and write one to two paragraphs discussing how this principle relates to this Racer Lab activity. More than one of the principles can be applied to this lab.

    2. Read the article discussing Amy Cuddy’s research: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/18/magazine/when-the-revolution-came-for-amy-cuddy.html. Discuss how this Racer Lab is related to the errors discussed in this article.

    Go back to Part 1 Continue to Part 3

     



    Dataspace

    Data Stories


    NYPD

    Covid-19

    Recidivism

    Brexit

    Stats Games


    Racer

    Greenhouse

    Statistically Grounded

    Psychic

    Roller Coaster

    Statspital

    Questions?

    If you have any questions or comments, please email us at DASIL@grinnell.edu

    Dataspace is supported by the Grinnell College Innovation Fund and was developed by Grinnell College faculty and students. Partial support provided by the Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science (TUES) program at the National Science Foundation under DUE#0510392, DUE #1043814, and DUE #1712475. Copyright © 2021. All rights reserved

    This page was last updated on March 19, 2025.